不可靠的语法规则

共同研习 · 发表于 2017-4-23 20:30:29

现在随着描写主义的兴起，越来越多的语法规则遭到质疑（甚至有些规则源于误解），我们来看看吧。

Littlebush · 发表于 2017-4-23 22:59:03

for example？On most occasions，the current grammar rules work.

spearonsquare · 发表于 2017-4-24 09:38:04

其实，规定语法犹如法律、法规和社会道德规范，主要是规范和引导作用，但是并不能说不存在违反上述规定的行为，只是这些行为不法、不好、或不为多数人接受罢了。
不符合规定的，也不一定有多大罪过。
所谓，没有规矩不成方圆。
我还是倾向于规定性语法，但是规定性语法也不应该是死的，应该适当适应社会发展变化。

wgl888 · 发表于 2017-4-24 12:40:45

语法并不是一成不变固定的语言法则

共同研习 · 发表于 2017-4-24 19:59:52

Littlebush 发表于 2017-4-23 22:59
for example？On most occasions，the current grammar rules work.

比如说不能用并列连词起句。

共同研习 · 发表于 2017-4-25 19:28:36

Littlebush 发表于 2017-4-23 22:59
for example？On most occasions，the current grammar rules work.

Many students are taught, and one guide maintains, that English sentences should not start with conjunctions such as "and", "but", "because", and "so". Some hypothesize that teachers invented this "rule" to encourage students to avoid overly simple sentences. This superstition has "no historical or grammatical foundation".
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conjunction_(grammar)

共同研习 · 发表于 2017-4-25 20:18:03

Well, he could hardly help keeping the first two injunctions; naturally his eyes were sharply watchful at such a time, nor was he likely to forget anything which might come under his notice in this objectionable way.

From: In the Golden Days by Ada Ellen Bayly (1857-1903)

Many books claim that "anything" should be followed by "that" instead of "which". In fact, this rule does not hold water.

Littlebush · 发表于 2017-4-26 18:56:29

Grammar is very very important.Without it, you are surely to make mistakes one after another,even for those whose mother tongue is English.

共同研习 · 发表于 2017-5-7 00:16:54

Littlebush 发表于 2017-4-26 18:56
Grammar is very very important.Without it, you are surely to make mistakes one after another,even fo ...

Subjunctive required？

[语言讨论] 不可靠的语法规则

点评