TA的每日心情 | 开心
2019-6-21 21:56 |
|---|
签到天数: 1 天 [LV.1]初来乍到
贡士
 
- 积分
- 4559
|
本帖最后由 uuttyypo 于 2022-7-24 09:11 编辑
立场——辩证思维训练（Taking Sides系列）PDF，MOBI，AZW4格式
应该是很全的了，我也不清楚是不是全套。有英文版和中文版，中文版内容也是英文的，相对英文版有删减。附件是taking sides 课程教学指导手册的几个report模版，网盘里也有，可以不下载。
选一本本介绍一下：
百度百科：《立场——辩证思维训练：传媒与社会篇（第12版）》是Taking Sides 系列丛书七本之一，选取了大众传播领域的十个最热门话题并从正反两方面论述，内容涵盖游戏和暴力的关系，广告是否对社会有利，脱口秀式“软”新闻是否误导了大众，纸媒的未来在哪里，网络匿名评论的利弊，“版权保护”是否有必要，青年人是否对新闻还抱有兴趣，信息化社会公众得到的信息是增加了还是减少了，等等。所摘选文章来自报刊杂志，互联网，以及最新行业学术研究。内容上说理充分，论证严密，语言地道，既适合作为所有读者拓宽知识面和见识的原版通识读物；同时对辩论比赛也有直接指导作用，有利于激发学生兴趣并培养学生用事实和逻辑作严肃且有效的学术辩论。
片段：Milton Friedman
The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits
When I hear businessmen speak eloquently about the “social responsibilities of business in a free-enterprise system,” I am reminded of the wonderful line about the Frenchman who discovered at the age of 70 that he had been speaking prose all his life. The businessmen believe that they are defending free enterprise when they declaim that business is not concerned “merely” with profit but also with promoting desirable “social ends; that business has a social conscience” and takes seriously its responsibilities for providing employment, eliminating discrimination, avoiding pollution and whatever else may be the catchwords of the contemporary crop of reformers. In fact they are—or would be if they or anyone else took them seriously—preaching pure and unadulterated socialism. Businessmen who talk this way are unwitting pup-pets of the intellectual forces that have been undermining the basis of a free society these past decades.
The discussions of the “social responsibilities of business” are notable for their analytical looseness and lack of rigor. What does it mean to say that “business” has responsibilities? Only people can have responsibilities. A corporation is an artificial person and in this sense may have artificial responsibilities, but “business” as a whole cannot be said to have responsibilities, even in this vague sense. The first step toward clarity in examining the doctrine of the social responsibility of business is to ask precisely what it implies for whom.
Presumably, the individuals who are to be responsible are businessmen, which means individual proprietors or corporate executives. Most of the discussion of social responsibility is directed at corporations, so in what follows I shall mostly neglect the individual proprietor and speak of corporate executives.
In a free-enterprise, private-property system, a corporate executive is an employee of the owners of the business. He has direct responsibility to his employers. That responsibility is to conduct the business in accordance with their desires, which generally will be to make as much money as possible while conforming to the basic rules of the society, both those embodied in law and those embodied in ethical custom. Of course, in some cases his employers may have a different objective. A group of persons might establish a corporation for an eleemosynary purpose—for example, a hospital or a school. The manager of From The New York Times Magazine, September 13, 1970. Copyright © 1970 by Milton Friedman. Distributed by The New York Times Special Features. Reprinted by permission.
知乎上的阅读建议：
taking sides和人文传统属于外研社出版的好书，中国学生学习这两套书都有很大的困难，一个是体量大，其次是词汇难。中国学生学习这两套书，千万不能急，建议拿出一篇两篇进行精读。逻辑当然很重要，taking sides是告诉你如何清晰地表达自己同时要运用各种证据但是表达、把逻辑构画出来需要的还是语言，如何驾驭语言是你精读中要注意到的(end)总结一下：不求速成，对文章精读，
比如每次只看一个topic，注意分析文章中的语言和逻辑。不过我们需要注意到，taking sides选取的文章虽不说过时，但离现在也接近十年以上了，有一些论据我们可以进行补充或者修改，你可以在精读之后，在Quora上找一些相关的回答甚至可以去英美主流杂志找一些相关的文章自己做一个相关主题的summary，这也算是顺便积累自己的观点和表达了吧。做到这些要求的前提应该是时间比较充裕，我觉得如果你参加了英语辩论队的话，读这套书应该更有收获吧。
知乎阅读建议链接：https://www.zhihu.com/question/65276666/answer/252045209
网盘链接：https://pan.baidu.com/s/11OREzjLaWmoQCcddg-DgGw
本帖隐藏的内容提取码：lxyu
hi，这是我用百度网盘分享的文件~复制这段内容打开「百度网盘」APP即可获取。
链接：https://pan.baidu.com/s/160z7Nv6JkYfQ7-qbeiMA-Q
本帖隐藏的内容提取码：6pzh
|
评分
-
3
查看全部评分
-
|
[复制链接]
发表于 2019-8-6 21:42:24
楼主
