TA的每日心情data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/65683/65683bba8e8da67e655db9e2b6965f466c71b571" alt="" | 开心 2019-12-18 19:08 |
---|
签到天数: 5 天 [LV.2]偶尔看看I
贡士
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/34644/34644e3ee6e5068497f0ba1f34a6d6c594039839" alt="Rank: 6" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e0182/e018216adeba0a9c2f0e36165e61e19a909acc93" alt="Rank: 6"
- 积分
- 4364
|
––How is it one careless match can start a forest fire, but it takes a whole box to start a campfire?––
Logically, a person can be careless, but a match can not be. ( And in my first language Chinese the equivalent or parallel expression is not allowed. You have to speak at least like this: a carelessly thrown match can start ...). But this is a common and economical way in English communication.
I was wondering when one can use an adjective which is essentially related to mankind to qualify an inanimate concrete noun?
I have once written “an easy understanding” and similar phrases, but "understanding" is an abstract noun and obviously a human action.
|
|